RSS

Daily Archives: December 29, 2010

Aung San Suu Kyi: Burma's First Lady of Freedom

 

December 29, 2010 (KATAKAMI / TIME) — The special branch had chased us across the city for hours, through the haunted, betel-nut-stained streets of old Rangoon, past street-side tailors hunched over ancient sewing machines and open-air bookstalls selling worm-eaten copies of Orwell and Kipling. Unable to shake the latest batch of state security men following us by foot, we jumped into a wheezing taxi of mid-20th century vintage. The young driver’s eyes widened at the foreigners who hurled themselves in the back and ordered the car to move — fast. As we lurched into motion, he showed us where he stood by reaching into his shirt pocket and pulling out a laminated picture. It was, of course, of the Lady.

Aung San Suu Kyi, the 65-year-old Burmese Nobel Peace Prize laureate who was released from house arrest on Nov. 13, was not in the taxi with my two colleagues and me. But she is always carried in the hearts — and her image in the pockets, lockets and secret hiding places — of millions of Burmese. Among the most oppressed and impoverished people on the planet, they draw sustenance from this graceful woman who, armed only with the principle of nonviolent resistance, dares to stand up to the generals who have controlled Burma for nearly five decades. For 15 of the past 21 years, the military regime kept her locked up. But if the generals wished for Suu Kyi to fade into obscurity, they failed. Continued confinement turned her into the world’s most famous political prisoner. Emerging from her most recent stint of seven years in detention, she is just as determined to fight for the civil liberties of Burma’s 50 million people. “What we are calling for is revolutionary change through peaceful means,” she told me when we recently met in Rangoon. “I’m not afraid to say it, and I’m not afraid to ask for all the help I can get.” (See photos of Aung San Suu Kyi’s freedom.)

The extent to which the junta has gone to try to foil the Lady, as Suu Kyi is fondly and universally known in Burma, is remarkable. For refusing to participate in a rigged election in November that the junta’s proxy party won, Suu Kyi’s party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), was stripped of its political rights. The NLD overwhelmingly won at the polls in 1990, which presumably would have made Suu Kyi the nation’s Prime Minister. But the junta ignored the people’s verdict then, and a new constitution contains clauses specifically designed to keep her from ever serving as Burma’s leader.

Since 1962, Burma’s battle-hardened generals have faced down communist insurgents, ethnic armies, even the Western governments that impose economic sanctions on the regime. But they still act as if there is no greater enemy than this slight woman with flowers in her hair. Their fear of Suu Kyi is not entirely misplaced. “We think our leader is the ideal woman, not just for Burma but for the whole world,” says Aye Aye Nyein, a teacher and member of the NLD’s youth wing. “We Burmese live in a prison. She teaches us how to fight for our freedom.” And the public’s desire for freedom, of course, is why security agents were hunting us, snapping pictures with telephoto lenses fit for Hollywood paparazzi. Earlier that day, a total of at least a dozen special-branch officers trailed us, calling in our movements on their cell phones. (See photos in “The Two Burmas.”)

It took the taxi driver only a couple of minutes to figure out we had a tail. Pointing back at a car practically on our bumper, he grinned and gunned the engine. For more than half an hour, our high-speed chase wound through the streets of Burma’s moldering former capital, past the carcasses of Victorian-era government buildings abandoned when the junta mysteriously moved the seat of power to a remote redoubt five years ago. We circumnavigated the massive golden spire of Shwedagon pagoda, Burma’s holiest site, and careened by the hulk of Insein prison, where Suu Kyi was once jailed and where some of the country’s 2,200 political prisoners still languish.

Dusk was falling. Screeching through an open-air market, the taxi finally shook our pursuers. Gratefully, we bid our driver goodbye. He reached into his pocket again, offering me Suu Kyi’s picture as a gift. I was touched, but it was his talisman to cherish. I could leave Burma. He needed the Lady to keep him safe. (Comment on this story.)

 

An Unending Struggle
Her carriage is regal, her English accent impeccable. The blossoms she customarily wears in her hair never seem to wilt, even as everything else droops in Burma’s sullen heat. In the NLD office, with its intermittent electricity and maps of mildew spread across concrete walls, Suu Kyi floats like some otherworldly presence, calm and cool as others are flushed and frenetic. Ever since she was released in mid-November, Suu Kyi’s days have been divided and subdivided into one-hour or 15-minute increments, during which she has met a dizzying array of people: foreign diplomats, AIDS patients, NGO directors, local economists, U.N. officials and the families of political prisoners. She even chatted by phone in December with former First Lady Laura Bush, who had championed the Burmese cause.

But even as the world watches Burma with renewed interest in the wake of Suu Kyi’s release, she has not yet met the people with whom she most wants to talk. The regime has ignored her repeated offers for national reconciliation dialogue. Since releasing her, the junta has dealt with Suu Kyi by acting as if she didn’t exist, expunging mentions of her from the local press and hoping that, despite her busy calendar and the huge crowds that gather wherever she goes, she will somehow dwindle into irrelevance. “I wish I could have tea with them every Saturday, a friendly tea,” Suu Kyi says of the generals, who refused to allow her dying husband one last visit to Burma in 1999. And if they turn down a nice cup of tea? “We could always try coffee,” she says wryly.

Far from being a simple morality tale of good vs. evil, the Lady against the generals, what happens in Burma carries global significance. Jammed between Asia’s two emerging powers, China and India, Burma is strategically sensitive, a critical piece in the new Great Game of global politics. This is no totalitarian backwater like North Korea. Even though many Western governments have imposed sanctions on Burma’s military regime for its atrocious human-rights record, a new competition is unfolding in this crossroads nation: regional powers are scrambling for access to Burma’s plentiful natural gas, timber and minerals. Already, resource-strapped China is building oil and gas pipelines across Burma to create another vital artery to feed its economic engine. Beijing’s cozy ties with Burma have spooked democratic India, which has exchanged earlier condemnation of the junta for trade missions — a stance that earned President Barack Obama’s public disapproval when he visited India in November. For Burma’s top brass — who have at their disposal a 400,000-strong military corps and a record of institutionalized rape, torture and forced labor — democratic reform would mean not only ceding political supremacy but also surrendering the opportunity to siphon wealth from ever growing state coffers. (See photos of Burma’s slowly shifting landscape.)

Unlike South Africa’s apartheid government when Nelson Mandela was released from prison, Burma’s dictatorship is not in its death throes. If anything, because of burgeoning foreign investment in Burma, especially over the past five years, the junta is even more entrenched than when Suu Kyi was last free, in 2003. Two previous attempts at popular protest have ended with the crackle of gunfire and the silence of a cowed populace. The most recent tragedy came in 2007 when soldiers ended weeks of monk-led protests by mowing down dozens of unarmed civilians.

The other foiled democracy movement was in 1988, when Suu Kyi found herself literally thrust on the political stage. The daughter of assassinated independence hero Aung San, she spent much of her early life overseas in India, the U.S., Japan, Bhutan and England. In the 1980s she was content to focus on academic research and serve as the mother of two sons and the wife of a British academic at Oxford. On picnics in the English countryside, Suu Kyi wore shorts and drank soda; she gave little hint of the democracy icon she would become. (See Suu Kyi in TIME’s top 10 political prisoners.)

In 1988 the dutiful Asian daughter went home to care for her ill mother. That Rangoon summer grew into Burma’s version of a Prague spring. The generals’ mismanagement had turned what was once one of Asia’s breadbaskets into an economic basket case, and students, monks and workers gathered by the hundreds of thousands to call for the regime’s downfall. The army fired on the protesters, some of whom tried to fight back. As the child of the revered general who had vanquished the colonial British, Suu Kyi thought she might have the authority to prevent further clashes. In front of half a million people, she made her first public address, mixing Buddhist values with Gandhian principles of nonviolent resistance. Less than a month after Suu Kyi’s plea for peace, the army unleashed another crackdown, killing hundreds. Two years later, the electoral victory of the NLD, the party she helped found, was disregarded. It was as if time stopped in Burma. (Comment on this story.)

Multiple Fronts
Today, despite Suu Kyi’s release and the influx of foreign investment that has brought the occasional Hummer and day spa to Rangoon, Burma is still a country preserved in amber. Tropical totalitarianism is deceptive. In North Korea, the broad, desolate avenues and drably dressed citizens make for a perfect tableau of authoritarianism. Burma’s sprays of bougainvillea, its gilded pagodas and the sway of schoolgirls dressed in the sarongs called longyis all create a false sense of contentment. But life in Burma is not easy. Roughly 40% of the national budget is spent on the army, while just around 1% each is reserved for health and education. The new capital in Naypyidaw, which means “abode of the kings,” was built with billions of dollars, even as nearly a third of Burmese live below the poverty line. For farmers, a hand-to-mouth existence is made worse by routine land seizures and orders to work without pay for the military. Even in Rangoon, power outages are as common as junta informants; both leave the populace in the dark. In a sign of just how removed the generals are from their subjects, confidential U.S. embassy cables released by WikiLeaks refer to the junta lavishing money on a nuclear program with alleged help from North Korea, while junta supremo Than Shwe pondered spending $1 billion on Manchester United at the behest of his soccer-loving grandson.

Although Suu Kyi’s moral imprimatur helped bring Western sanctions against the regime, the fact that many ordinary Burmese also feel their effects hasn’t escaped her. “I am ready to reconsider my support of sanctions if it’s for the benefit of all of us,” she told me with surprising vehemence, countering critics who think her too unyielding. “I’m not afraid to consider change.” Her openness will surely ignite further debate in Washington, where there is a growing recognition that sanctions on Burma, despite their moral appeal, have not worked.

But the most immediate revolution is needed within Suu Kyi’s party. Ever since the unfair outcome of the 1990 elections, the NLD has been stuck in a time warp, endlessly arguing over arcane policy and political theory even as many of its leaders get grayer and more stooped. There is a strange parallel between Burma’s geriatric opposition leaders, known as the Uncles, and the junta’s clutch of aged generals. In a 2008 cable released by WikiLeaks, an American diplomat in Rangoon bemoaned, “The way the Uncles run the NLD indicates the party is not the last great hope for democracy and Burma.” Since then, a leadership reshuffle has reinvigorated the party to a certain extent, and Suu Kyi’s release has galvanized a new generation of political youth. But it’s no wonder that a younger NLD faction called the National Democratic Force defied the NLD’s (and Suu Kyi’s) call for an electoral boycott and contested the November polls. Suu Kyi says she’s not worried about a possible split in the opposition. “We are all fighting for democracy,” she says. “Our goals are the same.” (See more on Suu Kyi’s fight for freedom.)

Suu Kyi, a woman who first used a cell phone on the day of her release, says she’s committed to nurturing a new generation of technologically savvy political youth. “The advantage is they’re very electronic. They can communicate with the world,” she says, referring to the NLD youth wing’s members who use Facebook to debate politics when there’s enough electricity to power computers. “Everything goes on the Internet. Did you know that?” The equalizing power of the digital revolution ties in nicely with the philosophy that has inspired Suu Kyi, that of Czech dissident and fellow Peace Prize laureate Vaclav Havel, who wrote of “the power of the powerless.” “My very top priority is for people to understand that they have the power to change things themselves,” she says. “Then we can do it together. Then we’ll be home and dry.”

A Heavy Burden
It’s a lot to ask of one woman: rejuvenate her banned party, persuade the generals to talk, make the cause of Burma a global priority, minister to the sick, comfort the families of political prisoners. Serving as an icon of democracy is hard enough, without having to deal with the nitty-gritty of everyday political life. Add to that the real worry that Suu Kyi may be operating on borrowed time. “Our people are in and out of prison all the time,” she says. “All I have to say is, ‘Is so-and-so in or out?’ and they know exactly what I mean.”

For now, she is out. But there’s little doubt that if the junta sees in her any realistic challenge to its authority, she will be sent in again on whatever spurious charge the military can concoct. “I want to do as much as I can while I’m free,” she says. “I don’t want to tire myself out, but we never know how much time we have.” (See photos of decades of dissent in Burma.)

Beyond the possibility of rearrest, Suu Kyi’s safety is an even more fundamental concern. The army has shown it is quite prepared both to lock her up and to endanger her life. On three occasions, Suu Kyi and her supporters have been attacked by mysterious thugs, with resulting fatalities. “She is like her father in that she has no qualms about losing her life,” says Win Htein, an NLD elder who was released in July after 14 years in jail. Suu Kyi gasps when I ask her whether she would consider wearing a bulletproof vest. “I wouldn’t dream of it,” she says. “Then it would look like I’m trying to protect myself from the people who support me.”

Suu Kyi may cherish her interactions with ordinary Burmese, but there is a distant quality to her, a sense that she lives most comfortably in her head, not among the crowds. Part of her remove is born of circumstance. She speaks proudly of being her father’s favorite child, yet he was assassinated by political rivals when she was just 2. For so much of her recent life, Suu Kyi has been sequestered from normal human contact; noble ideas and fine words have kept her company. While under house arrest, she obsessively read books ranging from biographies to spy thrillers. “People think that I had nothing to do [while in detention],” she says. “But I spent five or six hours listening to the radio every day. If you’re under house arrest and you miss one item, there’s no one there to tell you about it, so I listened very carefully.” Even her taste in classical music speaks to her sense of discipline and composure. Mozart, she says, makes her happy, which is all well and good. But she prefers Bach. “He makes me calm,” she says. “I need calm in my life.”

Right now, Suu Kyi is in the eye of a storm, a place of deceptive tranquility. Rangoon is a city of whispers, and while the people I met there used different words — a honeymoon, a window, a reprieve — their hushed intent was the same: this, they felt, was the calm before the crackdown. The November elections were part of what the generals call a transition to a “discipline-flourishing democracy.” One thing is certain: when the fig leaf of civilian government arrives in 2011, there will be no place in it for the Lady. (Comment on this story.)

Still, for all her years of imprisonment and whatever travails may come, Suu Kyi considers herself lucky. It’s not because of the people’s adoration of her but because of their respect — a value she believes stems from a generosity of spirit. “In my life, I have been showered with kindness,” she says. “More than love, I value kindness. Love comes and goes, but kindness remains.” When her son Kim was in Rangoon to see her for the first time in a decade, his kindness came in the form of a gift, a puppy to keep her company. “He’s my guard dog,” she jokes, even though the tiny mutt hasn’t shown much bark or bite. “He has an active tail and lets me know when someone is coming. That should be enough, don’t you think? A little wag of the tail?” (*)

 

Advertisements
 
Comments Off on Aung San Suu Kyi: Burma's First Lady of Freedom

Posted by on December 29, 2010 in World News

 

Tags:

South Korea's Lee says talks the answer to nuclear crisis

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak (C) encourages army soldiers during his visit to a military observation post of the front-line unit in the demilitarized zone in Yanggu, far northeast of Seoul, December 23, 2010. REUTERS/Blue House/Handout

 

December 29, 2010 SEOUL (KATAKAMI / Reuters) – South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who has vowed a tough stance against any further attack by North Korea, said on Wednesday the nuclear crisis must be tackled by negotiation.

Lee also called for fresh dialogue between the rival Koreas, saying a hardline military policy alone by Seoul, while offering an effective deterrent, will not ease the tension.

Stalled talks by six countries, which the North walked out of two years ago, were the only available forum to end the North’s nuclear program in return for economic aid and diplomatic recognition, Lee said at a policy briefing by the Foreign Ministry.

“I think removal of the North Korea nuclear programs should be achieved through six-party talks next year as North Korea targets 2012 for its achievement of a power country,” he said.

North Korea attacked the southern island of Yeonpyeong on Nov 23, killing four people. It was also blamed by the United States and South Korea for sinking a South Korean naval vessel in March, killing 46 sailors.

Like the United States, South Korea has signaled that it is loath to restart the diplomatic process — also involving China, Japan, and Russia — unless its reclusive neighbor shows steps toward completely dismantling its nuclear program.

China, the North’s main ally and economic backer, has called for a restart of the six-party talks without preconditions.

Lee said South Korea, however, must not let down its military guard against the North.

“Ensuring peace on the Korea peninsula is an important task going forward but this can’t be done with diplomacy only. I think we need strong defense capabilities and unity among the people should be achieved as prerequisites.”

But he made a fresh call for dialogue between the rivals, saying: “There must be efforts also to try to establish peace through dialogue between the South and the North.”

Lee has come under pressure over a perceived weak response to the Yeonpyeong attack that raised tension on the peninsula to the highest level since the 1950-53 Korean War.

Lee last week vowed “a merciless counterattack” against any fresh North Korean assaults as the South Korean army held rare large-scale military drills near the border in a demonstration of military might.  (*)

 
Comments Off on South Korea's Lee says talks the answer to nuclear crisis

Posted by on December 29, 2010 in World News

 

Tags: ,

Nick Clegg aims to calm Lib Dem fears in New Year message

Nick Clegg

 

Please also visit : INDONESIAKATAKAMI.BLOGSPOT.COM

 

December 29, 2010 (KATAKAMI / BBC) — Nick Clegg says his party has faced “testing times” in a message aimed at calming grassroots Lib Dem concerns.

In his New Year message to members, the deputy prime minister pledged to start 2011 with action on social mobility, civil liberties and the environment.

He also launched a renewed defence of the decision to break a pledge to oppose rises in student tuition fees.

And he insists he had delivered on “every single one and more” of the party’s general election priorities.

In the message, sent from Spain, where he is celebrating Christmas with his wife Miriam’s family, he told the Liberal Democrat membership: “Well, what a year! A white-knuckle election; a new coalition government; Liberals in power for the first time in 70 years.

“Just eight months ago we were campaigning on our four big manifesto priorities – fairer taxes; extra money for disadvantaged children in schools; a green, rebalanced economy; a new, open politics. And now we are delivering on every single one, and more.”

‘Difficult decisions’

He went on: “I don’t want to pretend it has all been easy. These are testing times for the country and for our party too. Action to tackle the deficit, and the need to reform higher education, have forced us to take some incredibly difficult decisions.

“But that is government. And when we promised people that we were ready to govern, that is the commitment we made. I genuinely believe that the choices we are making will stand the test of time.”

He says the decision to almost treble tuition fees, which saw the party break a pre-election pledge, was needed to retain “world-class” universities and protect poorer students.

And he says backing the Conservatives’ package of public spending cuts would “make sure future generations are not saddled with the burden of our debt”.

“And by showing people that [the] coalition can work, we can prove that plural, liberal politics is best for Britain,” he told them.

He says he will start the year by concentrating on “three big changes” in addition to campaigning for a “yes” vote in May’s referendum on changing the Westminster voting system to AV – a key concession won in the coalition negotiations.

He set out his priorities for 2011: “Radical reform of our political system and restoring our hard-won civil liberties; boosting social mobility so that no child is held back by the circumstances of his or her birth; and making sure the economic recovery is green and balanced, with opportunities spread across the whole country.”

He concluded: “All of us are going to hear some people predict the worst for our party. The same people who have been underestimating the Liberal Democrats for as long as we have existed.

“But we prove them wrong at every single turn. The next 12 months will be no different, because we will continue to build the Liberal, fairer, greener Britain that we all believe in.”  (*)

 
Comments Off on Nick Clegg aims to calm Lib Dem fears in New Year message

Posted by on December 29, 2010 in World News

 

Tags:

Nick Clegg’s New Year message to Liberal Democrat members

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg

December 29, 2010 (KATAKAMI / LIBDEMVOICE.ORG) — Nick Celgg’s message in full :

Well what a year! A white-knuckle election; a new coalition government; Liberals in power for the first time in 70 years.

Just eight months ago we were campaigning on our four big manifesto priorities – fairer taxes; extra money for disadvantaged children in schools; a green, rebalanced economy; a new, open politics.

And now we are delivering on every single one, and more.

From taking over 800,000 people on low pay out of paying income tax altogether, to restoring the earnings link for pensioners, from delivering the pupil premium in full by the end of this parliament to scrapping ID cards, from stopping the new runway at Heathrow to clamping down on industrial scale tax avoidance, and ending child detention, Liberal Democrats are making the difference for the people of Britain.

I don’t want to pretend it has all been easy. These are testing times for the country and for our Party too. Action to tackle the deficit, and the need to reform higher education, have forced us to take some incredibly difficult decisions.

But that is Government. And when we promised people that we were ready to govern, that is the commitment we made.

I genuinely believe that the choices we are making will stand the test of time.

By dealing with the deficit, we’ll make sure future generations are not saddled with the burden of our debt.

By changing the way universities are funded we are keeping them world class while at the same time giving disadvantaged young people more opportunity to go into university, not less.

And by showing people that coalition can work, we can prove that plural, liberal politics is best for Britain.

In the New Year I’ll be concentrating on three big changes: radical reform of our political system and restoring our hard-won civil liberties; boosting social mobility so that no child is held back by the circumstances of his or her birth; and making sure the economic recovery is green and balanced, with opportunities spread across the whole country.

And I, like you, will be out campaigning for a fairer voting system to make MPs work harder for your vote.

All of us are going to hear some people predict the worst for our Party. The same people who have been underestimating the Liberal Democrats for as long as we have existed.

But we prove them wrong at every single turn. The next twelve months will be no different, because we will continue to build the Liberal, fairer, greener Britain that we all believe in.

Happy New Year!

(*)

 
Comments Off on Nick Clegg’s New Year message to Liberal Democrat members

Posted by on December 29, 2010 in World News

 

Tags: